Soluble inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor and use thereof

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to cDNA encoding a soluble neuropilin protein (sNP) which is isolated from neuropilin (NP) producing cells or is recombinantly engineered from NP-encoding DNA. NP-1 and NP-2 are preferred NPs but any neuropilin or VEGF receptor (VEGFR), where the constituents share at least about 85% homology with either of the above VEGF 165 R/NP-1 and NP-2. More preferably, such constituent shares at least 90% homology. Still more preferably, each constituent shares at least 95% homology.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/5 80,989 filed onMay 30, 2000 now abandoned, which is a continuation of InternationalApplication PCT/US98/26138 filed on Dec. 9, 1998 which designates theU.S. and claims priority benefits of U.S. Provisional Application Ser.Nos. 60/069,155 filed on Dec. 9, 1997, 60/069,687 filed on Dec. 12, 1997and 60/099,615 filed on Sep. 9, 1998, all of which are incorporatedherein by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

The work described herein was supported, in part, by National Instituteof Health grants CA37392 and CA45548. The U.S. Government has certainrights to the invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF). More particularly, the invention relates to soluble inhibitorsof VEGF and use of those inhibitors in the treatment of disorders thatare associated with VEGF.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Blood vessels are the means by which oxygen and nutrients are suppliedto living tissues and waste products are removed from living tissue.Angiogenesis refers to the process by which new blood vessels areformed. See, for example, the review by Folkman and Shing, J. Biol.Chem. 267, 10931-10934 (1992), Dvorak, et al., J. Exp. Med., 174,1275-1278 (1991)). Thus, where appropriate, angiogenesis is a criticalbiological process. It is essential in reproduction, development andwound repair. However, inappropriate angiogenesis can have severenegative consequences. For example, it is only after many solid tumorsare vascularized as a result of angiogenesis that the tumors have asufficient supply of oxygen and nutrients that permit it to grow rapidlyand metastasize. Because maintaining the rate of angiogenesis in itsproper equilibrium is so critical to a range of functions, it must becarefully regulated in order to maintain health. The angiogenesisprocess is believed to begin with the degradation of the basementmembrane by proteases secreted from endothelial cells (EC) activated bymitogens such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basicfibroblast growth factor (bFGF). The cells migrate and proliferate,leading to the formation of solid endothelial cell sprouts into thestromal space, then, vascular loops are formed and capillary tubesdevelop with formation of tight junctions and deposition of new basementmembrane.

In adults, the proliferation rate of endothelial cells is typically lowcompared to other cell types in the body. The turnover time of thesecells can exceed one thousand days. Physiological exceptions in whichangiogenesis results in rapid proliferation typically occurs under tightregulation, such as found in the female reproduction system and duringwound healing.

The rate of angiogenesis involves a change in the local equilibriumbetween positive and negative regulators of the growth of microvessels.The therapeutic implications of angiogenic growth factors were firstdescribed by Folkman and colleagues over two decades ago (Folkman, N.Engl. J. Med., 285:1182-1186 (1971)). Abnormal angiogenesis occurs whenthe body loses at least some control of angiogenesis, resulting ineither excessive or insufficient blood vessel growth. For instance,conditions such as ulcers, strokes, and heart attacks may result fromthe absence of angiogenesis normally required for natural healing. Incontrast, excessive blood vessel proliferation can result in tumorgrowth, tumor spread, blindness, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Thus, there are instances where a greater degree of angiogenesis isdesirable—increasing blood circulation, wound healing, and ulcerhealing. For example, recent investigations have established thefeasibility of using recombinant angiogenic growth factors, such asfibroblast growth factor (FGF) family (Yanagisawa-Miwa, et al., Science,257:1401-1403 (1992) and Baffour, et al., J Vasc Surg, 16:181-91(1992)), endothelial cell growth factor (ECGF)(Pu, et al., J Surg Res,54:575-83 (1993)), and more recently, vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) to expedite and/or augment collateral artery development inanimal models of myocardial and hindlimb ischemia (Takeshita, et al.,Circulation, 90:228-234 (1994) and Takeshita, et al., J Clin Invest.93:662-70 (1994)).

Conversely, there are instances, where inhibition of angiogenesis isdesirable. For example, many diseases are driven by persistentunregulated angiogenesis, also sometimes referred to as“neovascularization.” In arthritis, new capillary blood vessels invadethe joint and destroy cartilage. In diabetes, new capillaries invade thevitreous, bleed, and cause blindness. Ocular neovascularization is themost common cause of blindness. Tumor growth and metastasis areangiogenesis-dependent. A tumor must continuously stimulate the growthof new capillary blood vessels for the tumor itself to grow.

There is mounting evidence that VEGF may be a major regulator ofangiogenesis (reviewed in Ferrara, et al., Endocr. Rev., 13, 18-32(1992); Klagsbrun, et al., Curr. Biol., 3, 699-702 (1993); Ferrara, etal., Biochem. Biophjs. Res. Commun., 161, 851-858 (1989)). VEGF wasinitially purified from the conditioned media of folliculostellate cells(Ferrara, et al., Biochem. Biophjs. Res. Commun., 161, 851-858 (1989))and from a variety of tumor cell lines (Myoken, et al., Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA, 88:5819-5823 (1991); Plouet, et al., EMBO. J.,8:3801-3806 (1991)). VEGF was found to be identical to vascularpermeability factor, a regulator of blood vessel permeability that waspurified from the conditioned medium of U937 cells at the same time(Keck, et al., Science, 246:1309-1312 (1989)). VEGF is a specificmitogen for endothelial cells (EC) in vitro and a potent angiogenicfactor in vivo. The expression of VEGF is up-regulated in tissueundergoing vascularization during embryogenesis and the femalereproductive cycle (Brier, et al., Development, 114:521-532 (1992);Shweiki, et al., J. Clin. Invest., 91:2235-2243 (1993)). High levels ofVEGF are expressed in various types of tumors, but not in normal tissue,in response to tumor-induced hypoxia (Shweiki, et al., Nature359:843-846 (1992); Dvorak et al., J. Exp. Med., 174:1275-1278 (1991);Plate, et al., Cancer Res., 53:5822-5827; Ikea, et al., J. Biol. Chem.,270:19761-19766 (1986)). Treatment of tumors with monoclonal antibodiesdirected against VEGF resulted in a dramatic reduction in tumor mass dueto the suppression of tumor angiogeneis (Kim, et al., Nature,382:841-844 (1993)). VEGF appears to play a principle role in manypathological states and processes related to neovascularization.Regulation of VEGF expression in affected tissues could therefore be keyin treatment or prevention of VEGF inducedneovascularization/angiogenesis.

VEGF exists in a number of different isoforms that are produced byalternative splicing from a single gene containing eight exons (Ferrara,et al., Endocr. Rev. 13:18-32 (1992); Tischer, et al., J. Biol. Chem.,806:11947-11954 (1991); Ferrara, et al., Trends Cardio Med., 3:244-250(1993); Polterak, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 272:7151-7158 (1997)). HumanVEGF isoforms consists of monomers of 121, 145, 165, 189, and 206 aminoacids, each capable of making an active homodimer (Polterak et al., J.Biol. Chem, 272:7151-7158 (1997); Houck, et al., Mol. Endocrinol.,8:1806-1814 (1991)). The VEGF₁₂₁ and VEGF₁₆₅ isoforms are the mostabundant. VEGF₁₂₁ is the only VEGF isoforms that does not bind toheparin and is totally secreted into the culture medium. VEGF₁₆₅ isfunctionally different than VEGF₁₂₁ in that it binds to heparin and cellsurface heparin sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and is only partiallyreleased into the culture medium (Houck, et al., J. Biol. Chem.,247:28031-28037 (1992); Park, et al., Mol. Biol. Chem., 4:1317-1326(1993)). The remaining isoforms are entirely associated with cellsurface and extracellular matrix HSPGs (Houck, et al., J. Biol. Chem.,247:28031-28037 (1992); Park, et al., Mol. Biol. Chem., 4:1317-1326(1993)).

VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases, KDR/Flk-1 and/or Flt-1, are mostlyexpressed by EC (Terman, et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,187:1579-1586 (1992); Shibuya, et al., Oncogene, 5:519-524 (1990); DeVries, et al., Science, 265:989-991 (1992); Gitay-Goran, et al., J.Biol. Chem., 287:6003-6096 (1992); Jakeman, et al., J. Clin. Invest.,89:244-253 (1992)). It appears that VEGF activities such asmitogenicity, chemotaxis, and induction of morphological changes aremediated by KDR/Flk-1 but not Flt-1, even though both receptors undergophosphorylation upon binding of VEGF (Millauer, et al., Cell, 72:835-846(1993); Waltenberger, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 269:26988-26995 (1994);Seetharam, et al., Oncogene, 10: 135-147 (1995); Yoshida, et al., GrowthFactors, 7:131-138 (1996)). Recently, Soker et al., identified a newVEGF receptor which is expressed on EC and various tumor-derived celllines such as breast cancer-derived MDA-MB-231 (231) cells (Soker, etal., J. Biol. Chem., 271:5761-5767 (1996)). This receptor requires theVEGF isoform to contain the portion encoded by exon 7. For example,although both VEGF₁₂₁ and VEGF₁₆₅; bind to KDR/Flk-1 and Flt-1, onlyVEGF₁₆₅ binds to the new receptor. Thus, this is an isoform-specificreceptor and has been named the VEGF₁₆₅ receptor (VEGF₁₆₅R). It willalso bind the 189 and 206 isoforms. VEGF₁₆₅R has a molecular mass ofapproximately 130 kDa, and it binds VEGF₁₆₅ with a Kd of about 2×10⁻¹⁰M, compared with approximately 5×10⁻¹²M for KDR/Flk-1. Instructure-function analysis, it was shown directly that VEGF₁₆₅ binds toVEGF₁₆₅R via its exon 7-encoded domain which is absent in VEGF₁₂₁(Soker, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271:5761-5767 (1996)). However, thefunction of the receptor was unclear.

The current treatment of angiogenic diseases is inadequate. Agents whichprevent continued angiogenesis, e.g, drugs (TNP-470), monoclonalantibodies, antisense nucleic acids and proteins (angiostatin andendostatin) are currently being tested. See, Battegay, J. Mol. Med., 73,333-346 (1995); Hanahan et al., Cell, 86, 353-364 (1996); Folkman, N.Engl. J. Med., 333, 1757-1763 (1995). Although preliminary results withthe antiangiogenic proteins are promising, there is still a need foridentifying genes encoding ligands and receptors involved inangiogenesis for the development of new antiangiogenic therapies.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

We have isolated a cDNA encoding the VEGF₁₆₅ R gene (SEQ ID NO: 1) andhave deduced the amino acid sequence of the receptor (SEQ ID NO:2). Wehave discovered that this novel VEGF receptor is structurally unrelatedto Flt-1 or KDR/Flk-1 and is expressed not only by endothelial cells butby non-endothelial cells, including surprisingly tumor cells.

In ascertaining the function of the VEGF₁₆₅R we have further discoveredthat this receptor has been identified as a cell surface mediator ofneuronal cell guidance and called neuropilin-1. Kolodkin et al., Cell90:753-762 (1997). We refer to the receptor as VEGF ₁₆₅R/NP-1 or NP-1.

In addition to the expression cloning of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA, we isolatedanother human cDNA clone whose predicted amino acid sequence was 47%homologous to that of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and over 90% homologous to ratneuropilin-2 (NP-2) which was recently cloned (Kolodkin, et al., Cell90, 753-762 (1997)).

Our results indicate that these neuropilins are expressed by bothendothelial and tumor cells including breast, prostate and melanoma.(FIG. 18) We have shown that endothelial cells expressing both KDR andVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 respond with increased chemotaxis towards VEGF₁₆₅, notVEGF₁₂₁, when compared to endothelial cells expressing KDR alone. Whilenot wishing to be bound by theory, we believe that VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1functions in endothelial cells to mediate cell motility as a co-receptorfor KDR.

We have also shown in the Boyden chamber motility assay that VEGF₁₆₅stimulates 231 breast carcinoma cell motility in a dose-response manner(FIG. 15A). VEGF₁₂₁, had no effect motility of these cells (FIG. 15B).Since tumor cells such as, 231 cells, do not express the VEGF receptors,KDR or Flt-1, while not wishing to be bound by theory, we believe thattumor cells are directly responsive to VEGF₁₆₅ via VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1.

We have also analyzed two variants of Dunning rat prostate carcinomacells, AT2.1 cells, which are of low motility and low metastaticpotential, and AT3.1 cells, which are highly motile, and metastatic.Cross-linking and Northern blot analysis show that AT3.1 cells expressabundant VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1, capable of binding VEGF₁₆₅, while AT2.1 cellsdon't express VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (FIG. 18). Immunostaining of tumor sectionsconfirmed the expression of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 in AT3.1, but not AT2.1tumors. Additionally, immunostaining showed that in subcutaneous AT3.1and PC3 tumors, the tumor cells expressing VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 were foundpreferentially at the invading front of the tumor/dermis boundary.Furthermore, stable clones of AT2.1 cells overexpressing VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1had enhanced motility in the Boyden chamber assay. These resultsindicate that neuropilin expression is associated with angiogenesis andmotile metastatic cancer cells, and thus is an important target forantiangiogenic and anticancer therapy.

We have now identified and cloned several neuropilin isoforms that aretruncated in the C-terminal region to produce soluble neuropilin (sNP)ectodomains (FIG. 19). These isoforms were cloned after a Northern blotanalysis revealed that some cell lines and tissues expressed smallertranscripts in addition to 7 kb neuropilin-1 (NP-1) and 7 kbneuropilin-2 (NP-2), that were apparently generated by alternativesplicing. Intact neuropilins have a domains homologous to complementcomponents, b domains homologous to coagulation factors, a c domainhomologous to MAM, a transmembrane domain and a short 40 amino acidcytoplasmic domain (Kawakami A. et al., (1995) J. Neurobiol. 29: 1-17.)(FIG. 19). An isoform of neuropilin-1 was cloned that is C-terminallytruncated right after the b domain. During transcription there isreading through a 5′ splice donor site so that part of an intron isexpressed followed by termination, with the result that the c,transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains are replaced by three intron aminoacids following the b domain. In addition, a neuropilin-2 isoform wascloned in which the C-terminal part of the b domain, the c domain, thetransmembrane domain and the cytoplasmic domain are replaced by 8 intronamino acids. The truncated neuropilin-1 cDNA was expressed in COS cellsand proteins in conditioned medium were analyzed by Western blot usingspecific anti-neuropilin-1 antibodies (FIG. 20). A 90 kDa proteinproduced by transfection of the truncated neuropilin-1 cDNA, but not ofthe vector control was found in conditioned medium but not in thelysate. Thus the neuropilin-1 isoform is a soluble form of neuropilin-1(sNP 1).

We have also expressed an engineered truncated soluble neuropilin-1ectodomain receptor that contains the a b and c domains (designated sNP1abc) by truncation at a site in the juxtamembrane domain.

sNPs are capable of binding to VEGF₁₆₅ or any form of VEGF that containsexon 7 (SEQ ID NO: 15) and therefore are useful for inhibiting VEGFinteraction not only with neurophilins but also with KDR Flk-1 and Flt-1as well. In addition, sNPs could also act as dominant negative receptorswhen expressed in cells by dimerizing with intact neurophilin receptors.Our results have shown that sNP1 protein preparations are excellentinhibitors of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding to PAE NP1 and of VEGF-mediated HUVECproliferation (FIG. 21).

One preferred sNP for use in methods of the invention is an isolatedsoluble neurophilin-1 comprising amino acids 227 to 587 of SEQ ID NO:2,or a fragment or a homolog thereof, that reduces VEGF₁₆₅ mediated HUVECproliferation.

Accordingly, sNPs or nucleic acids, e.g., DNA or RNA, encoding sNPs areuseful as inhibitors of VEGF and NP function and can be used to treatdiseases, disorders or conditions associated with VEGF. sNPs can be usedalone or in combination with other anti-VEGF strategies including, forexample, those that antagonize VEGF directly (e.g. anti-VEGF antibodies,soluble VEGF receptor extracellular domains), or antagonize VEGFreceptors (e.g. anti-KDR antibodies. KDR kinase inhibitors,dominant-negative VEGF receptors) (Presta L G, et al., Cancer Res. 57:4593-4599 (1997), Kendall R L. et al., (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res.Commun. 226: 324-328, Goldman C K, et al., (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 95: 8795-8800, Strawn L M, et al., (1996) Cancer Res. 56: 3540-3545,Zhu Z, et al., (1998). Cancer Res. 58: 3209-3214, Witte L, et al.,(1998). Cancer Metastasis Rev. 17: 155-161.)

Diseases, disorders, or conditions, associated with VEGF, include, butare not limited to retinal neovascularization, hemagiomas, solid tumorgrowth, leukemia, metastasis, psoriasis, neovascular glaucoma, diabeticretinopathy, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, endometriosis,mucular degeneration and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

In addition, the present invention relates to methods for screening forexpression of naturally occurring soluble neurophilins in selectedtissues. Expression can be analyzed at the RNA level (in situhybridization with specific probes corresponding to intron sequences),or at the protein level (Western blot detection of lower molecularmasses). The relative distribution of intact and truncated neurophilinisoforms can then be determined. These techniques can be used to analyzesNP distribution in cells, tissues and biological fluids such as urine.sNP1 and sNP2 both contain C-terminal intron sequences that are absentin intact neurophilins. sNP1 has 3 C-terminal terminal intron aminoacids (GIK) and 28 intron bp in the cDNA. sNP-2 has 8 C-terminal intronamino acids (VGCSWRPL, residues 548-555 of SEQ ID NO: 8) and 146 intronbp in the cDNA. Thus, sNP specific probes can be prepared for in situhybridization and to analyze for sNP distribution in tumors and normaltissue in a background of intact neurophilins.

Other aspects of the invention are disclosed infra.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. Purification of VEGF₁₆₅R From 231 Cells.

¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ (5 ng ml) was bound and cross-linked to receptors on 231cells and analyzed by SDS PAGE and autoradiograpy (lane 1) VEGF₁₆₅R waspurified by Con A and VEGF₁₆₅ affinity column chromatograpy and analyzedby SDS-PAGE and silver stain (lane 2) Two prominent bands were detected(arrows) and N-terminally sequenced seperately. Their N-terminal 18amino acid sequences are shown to the right of the arrows; SEQ ID NO:25(upper) and SEQ ID NO:26 (Lower). The published N-terminal sequences ofhuman (SEQ ID NO:9) and mouse neurophlin (SEQ ID NO:10)(Kawakami et al.J. Neurobiol, 29:1-17 (1995); He and Tesseier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-7511997) are shown below .

FIGS. 2A and 2B. Isolation of VEGF₁₆₅R cDNA by Expression Cloning.Photomicrographs (dark field illumination) of COS 7 cells binding¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅. ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ was bound to transfected COS 7 cells whichwere then washed, fixed, and overlayed with photographic emulsion thatwas developed as described in the example.

2A. COS 7 cells were transfected with a primary plasmid pool (#55 of the231 cell library) representing approximately 3×10³ clones and one COS 7cell binding ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ in the first round of screening is shown.

2B. Several COS 7 cells transfected with a single positive cDNA clone(A2) binding ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ after the third round of screening.

FIG. 3. The Deduced Amino Acid Sequence of Human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (SEQ IDNO:2). The deduced 923 amino acid sequence of the open reading frame ofVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1, clone A2 (full insert size of 6.5 kb) is shown. Theputative signal peptide sequence (amino acids 1-21) and the putativetransmembrane region (amino acids 860-883) are in boxes. The amino acidsequence obtained by N-terminal amino acid sequencing (FIG. 3, aminoacids 22-39) is underlined. The arrow indicates where the signal peptidehas been cleaved and removed, based on comparison of the N-terminalsequence of purified VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and the cDNA sequence. The sequenceof human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 reported here differs from that reported by He etal. (He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-751 (1997)) in that we findLys₂₆ rather than Glu₂₆, and Asp₈₅₅ rather than Glu₈₅₅ Lys₂₆ and Asp₈₅₅are found, however, in mouse and rat VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (Kwakami et al., J.Neurobiol. 29, 1-17 (1995); He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-7511997).

FIGS. 4A and 4B show the comparison of the Deducted Amino Acid Sequenceof Human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (SEQ ID NO:2) and NP-2 (SEQ ID NO:4). The deducedopen reading frame amino acid sequences of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and NP-2 arealigned using the DNASIS program. Amino acids that are identical in bothopen reading frames are shaded. The overall homology between the twosequences is 43%.

FIG. 5. Northern Blot Analysis of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 Expression in Human ECand Tumor-Derived Cell Lines. Total RNA samples prepared from HUVEC(lane 1) and tumor-derived breast carcinoma, prostate carcinoma andmelanoma cell lines as indicated (lanes 2-8) were resolved on a 1%agarose gel and blotted onto a GeneScreen nylon membrane. The membranewas probed with ³²P-labeled VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA and exposed to X-rayfilm. Equal RNA loading was demonstrated by ethydium bromide staining ofthe gel prior to blotting. A major species of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 mRNA ofapproximately 7 kb was detected in several of the cell lines.

FIG. 6. Northern Blot Analysis of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and KDR mRNA in AdultHuman Tissues. A pre-made Northern blot membrane containing multiplesamples of human mRNA (Clonetech) was probed with ³²P-labeledVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA (top) as described in FIG. 5, and then stripped andreprobed with ³²P-labeled KDR cDNA (bottom).

FIGS. 7A and 7B. Scatchard Analysis of VEGF₁₆₅ Binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1.7A. Increasing amounts of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ (0.1-50 ng/ml) were added tosubconfluent cultures of PAE cells transfected with human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1cDNA (PAE/NP-1 cells) in 48 well dishes. Non-specific binding wasdetermined by competition with a 200-fold excess of unlabeled VEGF₁₆₅.After binding, the cells were washed, lysed and the cell-associatedradioactivity was determined using a γ counter.

7B. The binding data shown in 7A were analyzed by the method ofScatchard, and a best fit plot was obtained with the LIGAND program(Munson and Rodbard, 1980). PAE/NP-1 cells express approximately 3×10⁵VEGF₁₆₅ binding sites per cell and bind ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ with a K_(d) of3.2×10⁻¹⁰ M.

FIG. 8. Cross-linking of VEGF₁₆₅ and VEGF₁₂₁ to PAE cells ExpressingVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and/or KDR. ¹²⁵ I-VEGF₁₆₅ (5 ng/ml) (lanes 1-6) or¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₂₁ (10 ng/ml) (lanes 7-10) were bound to subconfluent culturesof HUVEC (lane 1). PC3 (lane 2), PAE (lanes 3 and 7), a clone of PAEcells transfected with human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA (PAE/NP-1) (lanes 4 and8), a clone of PAE cells transfected with KDR (PAE/KDR) (lanes 5 and 9),and a clone of PAE/KDR cells transfected with human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA(PAE/KDR/NP-1) (lanes 6 and 10). The binding was carried out in thepresence of 1 μg/ml heparin. At the end of a 2 hour incubation, each¹²⁵I-VEGF isoform was chemically cross-linked to the cell surface. Thecells were lysed and proteins were resolved by 6% SDS-PAGE. Thepolyacrylamide gel was dried and exposed to X-ray film. Solid arrowsdenote radiolabeled complexes containing ¹²⁵I-VEGF and KDR, open arrowsdenote radiolabeled complexes containing ¹²⁵I-VEGF and VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1.

FIG. 9. Cross linking of VEGF₁₆₅ to PAE/KDR Cells Co-expressingVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 Transiently. PAE/KDR cells were transfected with pCPhygroor pCPhyg-NP-1 plasmids as described in “Experimental Procedures”, andgrown for 3 days in 6 cm dishes. ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ (5 ng/ml) was bound andcross linked to parental PAE/KDR cells (lane 1), to PAE/KDR cellstransfected with pCPhygro vector control (V) (lane 2), to PAE/KDR cellstransfected with pCPhyg-VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 plasmids (VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1) (lane 3),and to HUVEC (lane 4). The binding was carried out in the presence of 1μg/ml heparin. The cells were lysed and proteins were resolved by 6%SDS-PAGE as in FIG. 8. Solid arrows denote radiolabeled complexescontaining ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ and KDR. Open arrows denote radiolabeledcomplexes containing ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ and VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1.

FIG. 10. Inhibition of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ Binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 InterferesWith Its Binding to KDR. ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ (5 ng/ml) was bound tosubconfluent cultures of PAE transfected with human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA(PAE/NP-1) (lanes 1 and 2), PAE/KDR cells (lanes 3 and 4), and PAE/KDRcells transfected with human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA (PAE/KDR/NP-1) (lanes 5and 16) in 35 mm dishes. The binding was carried out in the presence(lanes 2, 4, and 6) or the absence (lanes 1, 3, and 5) of 25 μg/mlGST-Ex 7+8. Heparin (1 μg/ml) was added to each dish. At the end of a 2hour incubation, ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ was chemically cross-linked to the cellsurface. The cells were lysed and proteins were resolved by 6% SDS-PAGEas in FIG. 9. Solid arrows denote radiolabeled complexes containing¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ and KDR, open arrows denote radiolabeled complexescontaining ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ and VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1.

FIGS. 11A-C. A Model for VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 Modulation of VEGF₁₆₅ Binding toKDR. 11A.Cells expressing KDR alone. 11B.Cells co-expressing KDR andVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1. 11C.Cells co-expressing KDR and VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 in thepresence of GST-Ex 7+8 fusion protein.

A single KDR receptor or a KDR-VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 pair is shown in toppanels. An expanded view showing several receptors is shown in thebottom panels. VEGF₁₆₅ binds to KDR via exon 4 and to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 viaexon 7 (Keyt et al. J. Biol. Chem. 27I,5638-5646 (1996b); Soker et al.,J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). A rectangular VEGF₁₆₅ moleculerepresents a suboptimal conformation that doesn't bind to KDRefficiently while a rounded VEGF₁₆₅ molecule represents one that fitsbetter into a binding site. In cells expressing KDR alone, VEGF₁₆₅ bindsto KDR in a sub-optimal manner. In cells co-expressing KDR andVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1, the binding efficiency of VEGF₁₆₅ to KDR is enhanced. Itmay be that the presence of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 increases the concentration ofVEGF₁₆₅ on the cell surface, thereby presenting more growth factor toKDR. Alternatively, VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 may induce a change in VEGF₁₆₅conformation that allows better binding to KDR, or both might occur. Inthe presence of GST-Ex 7+8, VEGF₁₆₅ binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 iscompetitively inhibited and its binding to KDR reverts to a sub-optimalmanner.

FIG. 12. Human NP-2 amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:4).

FIGS. 13A, 13B and 13C show human NP-2 nucleotide sequence (SEQ IDNO:3).

FIGS. 14A-14F show nucleotide SEQ ID NO: 1 and amino acid sequences (SEQID NO:2) of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1. The domains are indicated.

FIGS. 15A and 15B. VEGF₁₆₅ stimulation of MDA MB 231 cell motility.(15A) Dose response of VEGF₁₆₅ motility activity. (15B) Both VEGF₁₆₅ andbFGF stimulate motility but VEGF₁₂₁ does not.

FIGS. 16A, 16B and 16C show motility and neuropilin-1 expression ofDunning rat prostate carcinoma cell lines AT3-1 (high motility, highmetastatic potential) and AT2.1 (low motility, low metastatic potential)cells. (FIG. 16A) AT3.1 cells are more motile than AT2.1 cells in aBoyden chamber assay. (FIG. 16B) 125I-VEGF₁₆₅ cross-links neuropilin-1on AT3.1 cells but does not cross-link to AT2.1 cells. (FIG. 16C) AT3.1but not AT2.1 cells express neuropilin-1, while both cell types expressVEGF.

FIGS. 17A and 17B. Overexpression of neuropilin-1 in AT2.1 cells. (17A)Western blot, (17B) motility activity. Three AT2.1 clones (lanes 4,5,6)express higher amounts of neuropilin-1 protein and are more motilecompared to parental AT2.1 cells or AT2.1 vector (AT2.1/V) controls andapproach AT3.1 cell neuropilin-1 levels and migration activity.

FIG. 18 shows expression of NP-1, NP-2 and β-actin in cancer cell linesand endothelial cells using reverse transcriptase PCR with the followingprimers:

Human NP-1 Forward (328–351): 5′ TTTCGCAACGATAAATGTGGCGAT 3′ (SEQ IDNO:11) Reverse (738–719): 5′ TATCACTCCACTAGGTGTTG 3′ (SEQ ID NO:12)Human NP-2 Forward (513–532): 5′ CCAACCAGAAGATTGTCCTC 3′ (SEQ ID NO:13)Reverse (1181–1162): 5′ GTAGGTAGATGAGGCACTGA 3′. (SEQ ID NO:14)

FIG. 19 is a schematic presentation of structures of (top) intactneuropilin (−1 and −2), of (middle) a newly cloned cDNA that encodes anectodomain of neuropilin-1, and (bottom) of a newly cloned cDNA thatencodes an ectodomain of neuropilin-2. These two new cDNAs representalternative spliced isoforms.

FIG. 20 shows cDNA encoding the C-terminally truncated neuropilin-1isoform was transfected into COS cells. A soluble 90 kDa protein (sNP1)was detected by Western blot in the conditioned medium of cellsexpressing sNP1 but not in the vector control. Intact 130 kDaneuropilin-1 expressed by MDA MB 231 cells is shown in the first lane.

FIGS. 21A and 21B show Soluble neuropilin-1 protein preparations (FIG.21A) inhibit ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding to PAE/NP cells and (Right) inhibitVEGF₁₆₅ mediated HUVEC proliferation. sABC is an engineered solubleneuropilin-1 truncated in the juxtamembrane region. sAB is a naturallyoccurring neuropilin-1 isoform missing c, TM and cytoplasmic domains. Inthis experiment sNP1 (FIG. 21B) is sABC produced in Example 3.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to cDNA encoding a soluble neuropilinprotein (sNP) which is isolated from neuropilin (NP) producing cells oris recombinantly engineered from NP-encoding DNA. NP-1 and NP-2 arepreferred NPs but any neuropilin or VEGF receptor (VEGFR), where theconstituents share at least about 85% homology with either of the aboveVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and NP-2. More preferably, such constituent shares atleast 90% homology. Still more preferably, each constituent shares atleast 95% homology.

Homology is measured by means well known in the art. For example %homology can be determined by any standard algorithm used to comparehomologies. These include, but are not limited to BLAST 2.0 such asBLAST 2.0.4 and i. 2.0.5 available from the NIH (Seewww.ncbi.ilm.nkh.gov/BLAST/newblast.html) (Altschul, S. F., et al.Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402 (1997))and DNASIS (Hitachi SoftwareEngineering America, Ltd.). These programs should preferably be set toan automatic setting such as the standard default setting for homologycomparisons. As explained by the NIH, the scoring of gapped resultstends to be more biologically meaningful than ungapped results.

For ease of reference, this disclosure will generally talk aboutVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and NP-2 and/or homologs thereof but all teaching areapplicable to the above-described homologs.

The present invention further relates to isolated and purified sNPprotein. sNP, as used herein, refers to a protein which can specificallybind to a vascular endothelial cell growth factor containing exon 7 (SEQID NO:15), e.g., VEGF₁₆₅, and has VEGF antagonist activity asdetermined, for example, by the human umbilical vein endothelial cell(HUVEC) proliferation assay using VEGF₁₆₅ as set forth in Soker et al.,J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31582-31588 (1997). Preferably, the sNP has at leasta 25% reduction in HUVEC proliferation, more preferably a 50% reduction,even more preferably a 75% reduction, most preferably a 95% reduction.

VEGF antagonist activity of the sNPs may also be determined byinhibition of binding of labeled VEGF₁₆₅ to VEGF₁₆₅R as disclosed inSoker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)) or to PAE/NP cellsas set forth in the Examples. Preferably, the portion inhibits bindingby at least 25%, more preferably 50%, most preferably 75%.

The term “isolated” means that the polypeptide or polynucleotide, e.g.,DNA, is removed from its original environment. For example, anaturally-occurring polynucleotides or polypeptides present in a livinganimal is not isolated, but the same polynucleotides or DNA orpolypeptides, separated from some or all of the coexisting materials inthe natural system, is isolated. Such polynucleotides could be part of avector and/or such polynucleotides or polypeptides could be part of acomposition, and still be isolated in that such vector or composition isnot part of its natural environment.

The nucleotide and amino acid sequence of fill length NP-1 is set forthin the Sequence listing as SEQ ID Nos: 1 and 2, respectively. Thenucleotide and amino acid sequence of fill length NP-2 is set forth inthe Sequence listing as SEQ ID Nos: 3 and 4, respectively.

DNA encoding human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 or NP-2 and recombinant humanVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 or NP-2 may be produced according to the methods set forthin the Examples.

Mammalian cell lines which produce NP-1 or NP-2 include, but are notlimited to, MDA-MB-231 cells (ATCC HTB-26), PC3 prostate carcinoma cellsand human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) (ATCC CRL 1730).

Other cells and cell lines may also be suitable for use to isolate sNP.Selection of suitable cells may be done by screening for sNP bindingactivity on cell surfaces, in cell extracts or conditioned medium or byscreening for gene expression by PCR or hybridization. Methods fordetecting soluble receptor activity are well known in the art (Duan,D-S. R. et al., (1991) J. Biol. Chem., 266, pp. 413-418).

Full length NP producing cells such as human HUVEC cells (American TypeCulture Collection, ATCC CRL 1730) [Hoshi, H. and McKeehan, W. L., Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., (1984) 81, pp. 6413-6417] are grown accordingto the recommended culture conditions of the ATCC. Intact NP as well asextracellular region (sNP-1 and sNP-2) are shown in FIG. 8. The intactreceptors have a domains homologous to complement components, b domainshomologous to coagulation factors, a c domain homologous to MAM, atransmembrane domain (TM) and a short 40 amino acid cytoplasmic domain(cyto). Two of the inhibitory forms of this receptor, which are thesubject of the present invention, are also shown in FIG. 8 and set forthin the sequence listing as SEQ ID NOS:6 and 8 and lack all of the cdomain, the transmembrane domain and the cytoplasmic domain. PreferredsNPs of the invention additionally lack the a domains.

Neuropilin-1 (SEQ ID NO:2) domains are as follows: a1(amino acids22-146), a2(amino acids 147-273), b1 (amino acids 275-430), b2 (aminoacids 431-587), c (amino acids 646-809), TM (amino acids 857-884), cyto(amino acids 885-923)

Neuropilin-2 (SEQ ID NO:4) domains are as follows: a1(amino acids24-148), a2(amino acids 149-275), b1 (amino acids 277-433), b2 (aminoacids 434-594), c (amino acids 642-800), TM (amino acids 865-893), cyto(amino acids 894-931).

Any of a variety of procedures may be used to molecularly clone sNPcDNA. These methods include, but are not limited to, direct functionalexpression of the sNP gene following the construction of an sNPcontaining cDNA library in an appropriate expression vector system.

Another method is to screen a sNP containing cDNA library constructed ina bacteriophage or plasmid shuttle vector with a labelledoligonucleotide probe designed from the predicted amino acid sequence ofsNP. One method consists of screening a sNP containing cDNA libraryconstructed in a bacteriophage or plasmid shuttle vector with a partialcDNA encoding at least part of the full length NP protein. This partialcDNA is obtained by the specific PCR amplification of sNP DNA fragmentsthrough the design of oligonucleotide primers from the known sequence offull length NP-encoding DNA.

It is readily apparent to those skilled in the art that other types oflibraries, as well as libraries constructed from other cells or celltypes, may be useful for isolating sNP-encoding DNA. Additionally,suitable cDNA libraries may be prepared from cells or cell lines whichhave sNP activity. The selection of cells or cell lines for use inpreparing a cDNA library to isolate sNP cDNA may be done by firstmeasuring secreted sNP activity using the methods described herein.

Preparation of cDNA libraries can be performed by standard techniqueswell known in the art. Well known cDNA library construction techniquescan be found for example, in Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual (2ndEd., Sambrook, Fritsch and Maniatis, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. 1989).

It is also readily apparent to those skilled in the art that DNAencoding sNP may also be isolated from a suitable genomic DNA library.Construction of genomic DNA libraries can be performed by standardtechniques well known in the art. Well known genomic DNA libraryconstruction techniques can be found in Sambrook, et. al., supra.

Another means of obtaining sNP molecules is to recombinantly engineerthem from DNA encoding the partial or complete amino acid sequence of anNP, e.g., NP-1 or NP-2. Using recombinant DNA techniques, DNA moleculesare constructed which encode at least a portion of the NP capable ofbinding VEGF containing exon 7 without stimulating mitogenesis. Standardrecombinant DNA techniques are used such as those found in Sambrook, etal., supra.

Using one of the preferred methods of the present invention, cDNA clonesencoding sNP are isolated in a two-stage approach employing polymerasechain reaction (PCR) based technology and cDNA library screening. In thefirst stage, DNA oligonucleotides derived from the extracellular domainsequence information from the known full length NP is used to designdegenerate oligonucleotide primers for the amplification of sNP-specificDNA fragments. In the second stage, these fragments are cloned to serveas probes for the isolation of complete sNP cDNA from a commerciallyavailable lambda gt10 cDNA library (Clontech) derived from HUVEC cells(ATCC CRL 1730).

Using another method, DNA encoding sNP is constructed from a DNAsequence encoding an NP. For purposes of illustration, DNA encoding NP-1is utilized. Using the receptor DNA sequence, a DNA molecule isconstructed which encodes the extracellular domain of the receptor, orthe VEGF binding domain only. Restriction endonuclease cleavage sitesare identified within the receptor DNA and can be utilized directly toexcise the extracellular-encoding portion. In addition, PCR techniquesas described above may be utilized to produce the desired portion ofDNA. It is readily apparent to those skilled in the art that othertechniques, which are standard in the art, may be utilized to producesNP molecules in a manner analagous to those described above. Suchtechniques are found, for example, in Sambrook et al., supra.

In a preferred method sNP cDNAs are tagged with a His domain in theN-terminus of the a domain and subcloned into the pcDNA3.1 mammalianexpression plasmid. Each of the plasmids is transfected into CHO-K1cells and G418 resistant clones are isolated. Conditioned medium iscollected and applied to a Con A Sepharose column, washed and Con Abinding proteins are eluted. The eluate is applied to a Nickel column,washed and Ni⁺⁺ binding sNP proteins are eluted. Purified sNP is assayedfor the ability to inhibit ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding to PAE/NP cells andVEGF₁₆₅ stimulation of C proliferation and motility. Smaller fragmentsare produced by PCR.

Our results indicate that VEGF binds to the b domain of neuropilin andthat the a and c domains are not needed. See, FIG. 19 Smaller portionsof b domain lacking increasingly larger segments of the N- and C-terminican be prepared by PCR using appropriate oligonucleotide primers. Theamplified cDNA is then ligated into an expression vector, expressed inCOS cells and conditioned medium tested for the ability to inhibit¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding to PAE/NP1 cells as shown for sNPs in FIG. 21A.

Additional truncated forms of NP can be constructed which contain thetransmembrane region. Retention of the transmembrane may facilitateorientation of the inhibitor molecule at the target cell surface.Construction of transmembrane region containing molecules is done bystandard techniques known in the art including but not limited toutilizing convenient restriction endonuclease cleavage sites or PCRtechniques as described herein.

The cloned sNP cDNA obtained through the methods described above may berecombinantly expressed by molecular cloning into an expression vectorcontaining a suitable promoter and other appropriate transcriptionregulatory elements, and transferred into prokaryotic or eukaryotic hostcells to produce recombinant sNP. Techniques for such manipulations arefully described in Sambrook, et al., supra, and are well known in theart.

Expression vectors are defined herein as DNA sequences that are requiredfor the transcription of cloned copies of genes and the translation oftheir mRNAs in an appropriate host. Such vectors can be used to expresseukaryotic genes in a variety of hosts such as bacteria, bluegreenalgae, fungal cells, yeast cells, plant cells, insect cells and animalcells.

Specifically designed vectors allow the shuttling of DNA between hostssuch as bacteria-yeast or bacteria-animal or bacteria-insect cells. Anappropriately constructed expression vector should contain: an origin ofreplication for autonomous replication in host cells, selectablemarkers, a limited number of useful restriction enzyme sites, apotential for high copy number, and active promoters. A promoter isdefined as a DNA sequence that directs RNA polymerase to bind to DNA andinitiate RNA synthesis. A strong promoter is one which causes mRNAs tobe initiated at high frequency. Expression vectors may include, but arenot limited to, cloning vectors, modified cloning vectors, specificallydesigned plasmids or viruses.

A variety of mammalian expression vectors may be used to expressrecombinant sNP in mammalian cells. Commercially available mammalianexpression vectors which may be suitable for recombinant sVEGF-Rexpression, include but are not limited to, pMC1neo (Stratagene), pXT1(Stratagene), pSG5 (Stratagene), EBO-pSV2-neo (ATCC 37593) pBPV-1(8-2)(ATCC 37110), pdBPV-MMTneo(342-12) (ATCC 37224), pRSVgpt (ATCC 37199),pRSVneo (ATCC 37198), pSV2-dhfr (ATCC 37146), pUCTag (ATCC 37460), andgZD35 (ATCC 37565).

DNA encoding sNP may also be cloned into an expression vector forexpression in a recombinant host cell. Recombinant host cells may beprokaryotic or eukaryotic, including but not limited to bacteria, yeast,mammalian cells including but not limited to cell lines of human,bovine, porcine, monkey and rodent origin, and insect cells includingbut not limited to drosophila, moth, mosquito and armyworm derived celllines. Cell lines derived from mammalian species which may be suitableand which are commercially available, include but are not limited to,CV-1 (ATCC CCL 70), COS-1 (ATCC CRL 1650), COS-7 (ATCC CRL 1651), CHO-K1(ATCC CCL 61), 3T3 (ATCC CCL 92), NIH/3T3 (ATCC CRL 1658), HeLa (ATCCCCL 2), C127I (ATCC CRL 1616), BS-C-1 (ATCC CCL 26) and MRC-5 (ATCC CCL171). Insect cell lines which may be suitable and are commerciallyavailable include but are not limited to 3M-S (ATCC CRL 8851) moth (ATCCCCL 80) mosquito (ATCC CCL 194 and 195; ATCC CRL 1660 and 1591) andarmyworm (Sf9, ATCC CRL 1711).

The expression vector may be introduced into host cells via any one of anumber of techniques including but not limited to transformation,transfection, liposome or protoplast fusion, and electroporation. Theexpression vector-containing cells are clonally propagated andindividually analyzed to determine whether they produce sNP protein.Identification of sNP expressing host cell clones may be done by severalmeans, including but not limited to immunological reactivity withanti-sNP antibodies, binding to radiolabelled VEGF, and the presence ofhost cell-secreted sNP activity.

Following expression of sNP in a recombinant host cell, sNP protein maybe recovered to provide sNP in active form, capable of binding VEGFwithout stimulating mitogenesis. Several sNP purification procedures aresuitable for use. sNP may be purified from cell lysates and extracts, orfrom conditioned culture medium, by various combinations of, orindividual application of salt fractionation, ion exchangechromatography, size exclusion chromatography, hydroxylapatiteadsorption chromatography, reversed phase chromatography, heparinsepharose chromatography, VEGF165 ligand affinity chromatography, andhydrophobic interaction chromatography.

In addition, recombinant sNP can be separated from other cellularproteins by use of an immuno-affinity column made with monoclonal orpolyclonal antibodies specific for full length sNP, or polypeptidefragments of sNP.

Preferably, sNPs can be purified by transfecting sNP containing DNAconstructs into COS cells (transient transfection) and CHO cells (stabletransfectants). The constructs used can be double tagged near theN-termini of the neuropilin (in the a domain which is not needed forVEGF binding) with, for example, both His and myc tags. Lectin columnchromatography, is useful as a first step in sNP purification. Thesecond step in the purification is to use a nickel column to bind theHis-tagged proteins, and if necessary, anti-myc antibodies. The presentinventors have shown that tagged sNPs are fully active in inhibitingVEGF binding to cells (FIG. 21A). To purify non-tagged sNPs, acombination of lectin and VEGF affinity chromatography is sufficient asshown in the examples for purification of intact neuropilin-1.

Purified sNP proteins can then be tested for effects on VEGF-mediatedendothelial cell (e.g. HUVEC) migration and proliferation and themigration of endothelial cells out of rat aortic rings (in vitroangiogenesis). sNP proteins can also be tested in vivo for inhibition ofVEGF-mediated angiogenesis in chick CAM, and mouse cornea models. FGF-2,which should not interact with sNPs can be used as a control. PurifiedsNP protein and DNA encoding the protein can also be test mouse models,in particular PC3 tumors grown subcutaneously or orthotopically intonude mice, to look for inhibition of angiogenesis, tumor growth andmetastases.

The inhibitor of the present invention can be used for the inhibition ofVEGF mediated activity including angiogenesis and tumor cell motility.The inhibitor can be used either topically or intravascularly. Fortopical applications the formulation would be applied directly at a rateof about 10 ng to about 1 mg/cm2/day. For intravaneous applications, theinhibitor is used at a rate of about 1 mg to about 10 mg/kg/day of bodyweight. For internal use, the formulation may be released directly intothe region to be treated either from implanted slow release polymericmaterial or from slow release pumps or repeated injections. The releaserate in either case is about 100 ng to about 100 mg/day/cm3.

For non-topical application the inhibitor is administered in combinationwith pharmaceutically acceptable carders or diluents such as phosphatebuffer, saline, phosphate buffered saline, Ringer's solution, and thelike, in a pharmaceutical composition, according to standardpharmaceutical practice. For topical application, various pharmaceuticalformulations are useful for the administration of the active compound ofthis invention. Such formulations include, but are not limited to, thefollowing: ointments such as hydrophilic petrolatum or polyethyleneglycol ointment; pastes which may contain gums such as xanthan gum,solutions such as alcoholic or aqueous solutions; gels such as aluminumhydroxide or sodium alginate gels; albumins such as human or animalalbumins; collagens such as human or animal collagens; celluloses suchas alkyl celluloses, hydroxy alkyl celluloses and alkylhydroxyalkylcelluloses, for example methylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose,carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, andhydroxypropyl cellulose; polyoxamers such as Pluronic.RTM. Polyolsexemplified by Pluronic.RTM. F-127; tetronics such as tetronic 1508; andalginates such as sodium alginate.

The sNPs of the invention can be combined with a therapeuticallyeffective amount of another molecule which negatively regulatesangiogenesis which may be, but is not limited to, TNP470, plateletfactor 4, thrombospondin-1, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases (TIMP1and TIMP2), prolactin (16-Kd fragment), angiostatin (38-Kd fragment ofplasminogen), endostatin, bFGF soluble receptor, transforming growthfactor beta, interferon alfa, soluble KDR and FLT-1 receptors andplacental proliferin-related protein.

A sNP of the invention may also be combined with chemotherapeuticagents.

The DNA encoding a sNP of the invention can be used in the form of genetherapy and delivered to a host by any method known to those of skill inthe art to treat disorders associated with VEGF.

A preferred embodiment of the present invention relates to methods ofinhibiting angiogenesis of solid tumors to prevent further tumor growthand eventual metastasis. To this end, any solid tumor or the regionsurrounding the tumor accessible to gene transfer will be a target forthe disclosed therapeutic applications. A DNA encoding an sNP, housedwithin a recombinant viral- or non-viral-based gene transfer system maybe directed to target cells within proximity of the tumor by any numberof procedures known in the art, including but not limited to (a)surgical procedures coupled with administration of an effective amountof the DNA to the site in and around the tumor (involving initialremoval of a portion or the entire tumor, if possible); (b) injection ofthe gene transfer vehicle directly into or adjacent to the site of thetumor; and, (c) localized or systemic delivery of the gene transfervector and/or gene product using techniques known in the art.

Any solid tumor that contains VEGF or neuropilin expressing cells willbe a potential target for treatment. Examples, but by no means listed asa limitation of solid tumors which will be particularly vulnerable togene therapy applications are (a) neoplasms of the central nervoussystem such as, but again not necessarily limited to glioblastomas,astrocytomas, neuroblastomas, meningiomas, ependymomas; (b) cancers ofhormone-dependent, tissues such as protstate, testicles, uterus, cervix,ovary, mammary carcinomas including but not limited to carcinoma insitu, medullary carcinoma, tubular carcinoma, invasive (infiltrating)carcinomas and mucinous carcinomas; (c) melanomas, including but notlimited to cutaneous and ocular melanomas; (d) cancers of the lung whichat least include squamous cell carcinoma, spindle carcinoma, small cellcarcinoma, adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma; and (e) cancers ofthe gastrointestinal system such as esophageal, stomach, smallintestine, colon, colorectal, rectal and anal region which at leastinclude adenocarcinomas of the large bowel.

A DNA fragment encoding an sNP may be delivered either systemically orto target cells in the proximity of a solid tumor of the mammalian hostby viral or non-viral based methods. Viral vector systems which may beutilized in the present invention include, but are not limited to, (a)adenovirus vectors; (b) retrovirus vectors; (c) adeno-associated virusvectors; (d) herpes simplex virus vectors; (e) SV 40 vectors; (f)polyoma virus vectors; (g) papilloma virus vectors; (h) picarnovirusvectors; and (i) vaccinia virus vectors.

The recombinant virus or vector containing the DNA encoding the sNP ofthe present invention is preferably administered to the host by directinjection into a solid tumor and/or quiescent tissue proximal to thesolid tumor, such as adipose or muscle tissue. It will of course beuseful to transfect tumor cells in the region of targeted adipose andmuscle tissue. Transient expression of the sNPs in these surroundingcells will result in a local extracellular increase in these proteinsand will promote binding with VEGF, thus inhibiting binding of VEGF tothe receptors.

Non-viral vectors which are also suitable include DNA-lipid complexesfor example liposome-mediated or ligand/poly-L-Lysine conjugates, suchas asialoglyco-protein-mediated delivery systems (see. e.g. Felgner etal., 1994, J. Biol. Chem. 269: 2550-2561; Derossi et al., 1995, Restor.Neurol. Neuros. 8: 7-10: and Abcallah et al., 1995, Biol. Cell 85:1-7).Direct injection of “naked” DNA may also be used.

The invention also provides a pharmaceutical pack or kit comprising oneor more containers filled with one or more of the ingredients of thepharmaceutical compositions of the invention. Optionally associated withsuch container(s) can be a notice in the form prescribed by agovernmental agency regulating the manufacture, use or sale ofpharmaceuticals or biological products, which notice reflects approvalby the agency of manufacture, use or sale for human administration.

All references cited above or below are herein incorporated byreference.

The present invention is further illustrated by the following Examples.These Examples are provided to aid in the understanding of the inventionand are not construed as a limitation thereof.

EXAMPLE 1

Experimental Procedures

Materials

Cell culture media, lipofectin and lipofectamin reagents fortransfection were purchased from Life Technologies. Human recombinantVEGF₁₆₅ and VEGF₁₂₁ were produced in Sf-21 insect cells infected withrecombinant baculovirus vectors encoding either human VEGF₁₆₅ or VEGF₁₂₁as previously described (Cohen et al., Growth Factors, 7, 131-138(1992); Cohen et al., J. Biol. Chem., 270, 11322-11326 (1995)). GST VEGFexons 7+8 fusion protein was prepared in E. Coli and purified aspreviously described (Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem., 271, 5761-5767(1996)). Heparin, hygromycin B and protease inhibitors were purchasedfrom Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.). ¹²⁵I-Sodium, ³²P-dCTP, and GeneScreen-Plushybridization transfer membrane were purchased from DuPont NEN (Boston,Mass.). Disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and IODO-BEADS were purchased fromPierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, Ill.). Con A Sepharose was purchased fromPharmacia LKB Biotechnology Inc. (Piscataway, N.J.). RNAzol-B waspurchased from TEL-TEST Inc. (Friendswood, Tex.). Silver Stain kit andTrans-Blot PVDF membranes were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories(Hercules, Calif.). Multiple tissue northern blot membranes werepurchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, Calif.). PolyATract mRNA isolationkits were purchased from Promega (Madison, Wis.). RediPrime DNA labelingkits and molecular weight markers were purchased from Amersham(Arlington Heights, Ill.). Plasmids: pcDNA3.1 was purchased fromInvitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.), and pCPhygro, containing the CMV promoterand encoding hygromycin B phosphorylase, was kindly provided by Dr.Urban Deutsch (Max Plank Institute, Bad Nauheim, Germany). Restrictionendonucleases and Ligase were purchased from New England Biolabs, Inc(Beverly, Mass.). NT-B2 photographic emulsion and x-ray film werepurchased from the Eastman Kodak company (Rochester N.Y.).

Cell culture

Human umbilical vein EC (HUVEC) were obtained from American Type CultureCollection (ATCC) (Rockville, Md.), and grown on gelatin coated dishesin M-199 medium containing 20% fetal calf serum (FCS) and a mixture ofglutamine, penicillin and streptomycin (GPS). Basic FGF (2 ng/ml) wasadded to the culture medium every other day. Parental porcine aorticendothelial (PAE) cells and PAE cells expressing KDR (PAE/KDR)(Waltenberger et al., J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26988-26995 (1994)) werekindly provided by Dr. Lena Claesson-Welsh and were grown in F12 mediumcontaining 10% FCS and GPS. MDA-MB-231 cells and MDA-MB453 cells wereobtained from ATCC, and grown in DMEM containing 10% FCS and GPS. Thehuman melanoma cell lines, RU-mel, EP-mel and WK-mel were kindlyprovided by Dr. Randolf Byer (Boston University Medical School, Boston,Mass.), and grown in DMEM containing 2% FCS, 8% calf serum and GPS.Human metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma, LNCaP and prostate carcinoma,PC3 cells were kindly provided by Dr. Michael Freeman (Children'sHospital, Boston, Mass.), and grown in RPMI 1640 containing 5% FCS andGPS.

Purification and Protein Sequencing

Approximately 5×10⁸ MDA-MB-231 cells grown in 150 cm dishes were washedwith PBS containing 5 mM EDTA, scraped and centrifuged for 5 min at 500g. The cell pellet was lysed with 150 ml of 20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 0.5%triton X-100 and protease inhibitors including 1 mM AEBSF, 5 μg/mlleupeptin and 5 μg/ml aprotinin for 30 min on ice, and the lysate wascentrifuged at 30,000×g for 30 min. MnCl₂ and CaCl₂ were added to thesupernatant to obtain a final concentration of 1 mM each. The lysate wasabsorbed onto a Con A Sepharose column (7 ml) and bound proteins wereeluted with 15 ml 20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1% triton X-100 and1 M methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside at 0.2 ml/min. The elution was repeatedtwice more at 30 minute intervals. The Con A column eluates were pooledand incubated for 12 h at 4° C. with 0.5 ml of VEGF₁₆₅-Sepharose beads,containing about 150 μg VEGF₁₆₅, prepared as described previously(Wilchek and Miron, Biochem. Int. 4, 629-635. (1982)). TheVEGF₁₆₅-Sepharose beads were washed with 50 ml of 20 mM HEPES, pH 8.0,0.2 M NaCl and 0.1% triton X-100 and then with 25 ml of 20 mM HEPES, pH8.0. The beads were boiled in SDS-PAGE buffer and bound proteins wereseparated by 6% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to a TransBlot PVDFmembrane using a semi-dry electric blotter (Hoeffer Scientific), and thePVDF membrane was stained with 0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue in 40%methanol. The two prominent proteins in a 130-140 kDa doublet were cutout separately and N-terminally sequenced using an Applied Biosystemsmodel 477A microsequenator as a service provided by Dr. William Lane ofthe Harvard Microchemistry facility (Cambridge, Mass.).

Expression Cloning and DNA Sequencing

Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 5 μg 231 mRNA.Double-stranded cDNA was ligated to EcoRI adaptors, andsize-fractionated on a 5-20% potassium acetate gradient. DNA fragmentslarger than 2 kb were ligated to an eukaryotic expression plasmid,pcDNA3.1. The plasmid library was transfected into E. coli to yield aprimary library of approximately 1×10⁷ individual clones. A portion ofthe transformed bacteria was divided into 240 pools, each representingapproximately 3×10³ individual clones. DNA prepared from each pool wasused to transfect COS-7 cells seeded in 12 well dishes, using theLipofectin reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions. Threedays after transfection, the cells were incubated on ice for 2 h with¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ (10 ng/ml) in the presence of 1 μg/ml heparin, washed andfixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding toindividual cells was detected by overlaying the monolayers withphotographic emulsion, NT-B2, and developing the emulsion after two daysas described (Gearing et al., 1989). Seven positive DNA pools wereidentified and DNA from one of the positive pools was used to transformE. Coli. The E. coli were sub-divided into 50 separate pools and platedonto 50 LB ampicillin dishes, with each pool representing approximately100 clones. DNA made from these pools was transfected into COS-7 cellswhich were screened for ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding as described above. Twentypositive pools were detected at this step, and their corresponding DNAswere used to transform E. Coli. Each pool was plated onto separate LBampicillin dishes and DNA was prepared from 96 individual colonies andscreened in a 96-well two dimensional grid for ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding totranfected COS-7 cells as described above. Seven single clones wereidentified as being positive at this step. The seven positive plasmidclones were amplified and their DNA was analyzed by restriction enzymedigestion. Six clones showed an identical digestion pattern of digestand one was different. One clone from each group was submitted forautomated DNA sequencing.

Northern Analysis

Total RNA was prepared from cells in culture using RNAzol according tothe manufacturer's instructions. Samples of 20 μg RNA were separated ona 1% formaldehide-agarose gel, and transferred to a GeneScreen-Plusmembrane. The membrane was hybridized with a ³²P labeled fragment ofhuman VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA, corresponding to nucleotides 63454 in the ORF,at 63° C. for 18 h. The membrane was washed and exposed to an x-ray filmfor 18 h. A commercially-obtained multiple human adult tissue mRNA blot(Clonetech, 2 μg/lane) was probed for human NP-1 in a similar manner.The multiple tissue blot was stripped by boiling in the presence of 0.5%SDS and re-probed with a ³²P labeled fragment of KDR cDNA correspondingto nucleotides 2841-3251 of the ORF (Terman et al., Oncogene 6,1677-1683 (1991))

Transfection of PAE Cells

Parental PAE cells and PAE cells expressing KDR (PAE/KDR) (Waltenbergeret al., 1994) were obtained from Dr. Lena Claesson-Welsh. Human NP-1cDNA was digested with XhoI and XbaI restriction enzymes and subclonedinto the corresponding sites of pCPhygro, to yield pCPhyg-NP-1. PAE andPAE/KDR cells were grown in 6 cm dishes and transfected with 5 μg ofpCPhyg-NP-1 using Lipofectamine, according to the manufacturer'sinstructions. Cells were allowed to grow for an additional 48 h and themedium was replaced with fresh medium containing 200 μg/ml hygromycin B.After 2 weeks, isolated colonies (5-10×10³ cell/colony) were transferredto separate wells of a 48 well dish and grown in the presence of 200μg/ml hygromycin B. Stable PAE cell clones expressing VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1(PAE/NP-1) or co-expressing VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and KDR (PAE/KDR/NP-1) werescreened for VEGF₁₆₅ receptor expression by binding and cross linking of¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅. For transient transfection, PAE/KDR cells were transfectedwith VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 as described above and after three days ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅cross-linking analysis was carried out.

Radio-iodination of VEGF, Binding and Cross-linking Experiments.

The radio-iodination of VEGF₁₆₅ and VEGF₁₂₁ using IODO-BEADS was carriedout as previously described (Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem.272,31582-31588 (1997)). The specific activity ranged from40,000-100,000 cpm/ng protein. Binding and cross-linking experimentsusing ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ and ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₂₁ were performed as previouslydescribed (Gitay-Goren et al., J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6093-6098 (1992);Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). VEGF binding wasquantitated by measuring the cell-associated radioactivity in aγ-counter (Beckman, Gamma 5500). The counts represent the average ofthree wells. All experiments were repeated at least three times andsimilar results were obtained. The results of the binding experimentswere analyzed by the method of Scatchard using the LIGAND program(Munson and Rodbard, 1980). ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ and ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₂₁ cross linkedcomplexes were resolved by 6% SDS/PAGE and the gels were exposed to anX-Ray film. X-ray films were subsequently scanned by using an IS-1000digital imaging system (Alpha Innotech Corporation)

Purification of VEGF₁₆₅R

Cross-linking of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ to cell surface receptors of 231 cellsresults in formation of a 165-175 kDa labeled complex (Soker et al., J.Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). These cells have about 1-2×10⁵VEGF₁₆₅ binding sites/cell. In contrast to VEGF₁₆₅, VEGF₁₂₁ does notbind to the 231 cells and does not form a ligand-receptor complex (Sokeret al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). The relatively highVEGF₁₆₅R number and the lack of any detectable KDR or Flt-1 mRNA in 231cells (not shown) suggested that these cells would be a useful sourcefor VEGF₁₆₅R purification. Preliminary characterization indicated thatVEGF₁₆₅R is a glycoprotein and accordingly, a 231 cell lysate preparedfrom approximately 5×10⁸ cells was absorbed onto a Con A Sepharosecolumn. Bound proteins, eluted from the Con A column, were incubatedwith VEGF₁₆₅-Sepharose and the VEGF₁₆₅-affinity purified proteins wereanalyzed by SDS-PAGE and silver staining (FIG. 9, lane 2). A prominentdoublet with a molecular mass of about 130-135 kDa was detected. Thissize is consistent with the formation of a 165-175 kDa complex of 40-45kDa VEGF₁₆₅ bound to receptors approximately 130-135 kDa in size (FIG.9, lane 1). The two bands were excised separately and N-terminal aminoacid sequencing was carried out (FIG. 1, right). Both the upper andlower bands had similar N-terminal amino acid sequences which showedhigh degrees of sequence homology to the predicted amino acid sequencesin the N-terminal regions of mouse (Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol, 29,1-17 (1995)) and human neuroplilin-1 (NP-1) (He and Tessier-Lavigne,Cell 90739-751 (1997)).

Expression Cloning of VEGF₁₆₅R from 231 Cell-derived mRNA

Concomitant with the purification, VEGF₁₆₅R was cloned by expressioncloning (Aruffo and Seed, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 8573-8577(1987a); Aruffo and Seed, EMBO J., 6, 3313-3316 (1987b); Gearing et al.,EMBO J. 8,3667-3676 (1989)). For expression cloning, 231 cell mRNA wasused to prepare a cDNA library of approximately 10⁷ clones in aeukaryotic expression plasmid. E. coli transformed with the plasmidlibrary were divided into pools. The DNA prepared from each pool weretransfected into COS-7 cells in separate wells and individual cells werescreened for the ability to bind ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ as detected byautoradiography of monolayers overlayed with photographic emulsion (FIG.2A). After three rounds of subpooling and screening, seven singlepositive cDNA clones were obtained. FIG. 2B shows binding of¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ to COS-7 cells transfected with one of these singlepositive clones (clone A2).

Restriction enzyme analysis revealed that six of the seven positivesingle clones had identical restriction digestion patterns but that oneclone had a pattern that was different (not shown). Sequencing of one ofthese similar cDNA clones, clone A2 (FIG. 3), showed it to be identicalto a sequence derived from a human-expressed sequence tag data bank(dbEST). This sequence also showed a high percentage of homology to thesequence of mouse neuropilin, NP-1 (Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol 29,1-17 (1995)). After we had cloned human VEGF₁₆₅R, two groups reportedthe cloning of rat and human receptors for semaphorin III and identifiedthem to be NP-1 (He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-751 (1997);Kolodkin et al., Cell 90, 753-762 (1997)). The 231 cell-derived VEGF₁₆₅RcDNA sequence is virtually identical (see figure legend 3 forexceptions) to the human NP-1 sequence (He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90,739-751 (1997)). Significantly, the predicted amino acid sequenceobtained by expression cloning (FIG. 3) confirmed the identification ofVEGF₁₆₅R as NP-1 that was determined by N-terminal sequencing (FIG. 1),and we have therefore named this VEGF receptor, VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1.

The human VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA sequence predicts an open reading frame(ORF) of 923 amino acids with two hydrophobic regions representingputative signal peptide and transmembrane domains (FIG. 3). Overall, thesequence predicts ectodomain, transmembrane and cytoplasmic domainsconsistent with the structure of a cell surface receptor. The N-terminalsequence obtained via protein purification as shown in FIG. 1 isdownstream of a 21 amino acid putative hydrophobic signal peptidedomain, thereby indicating directly where the signal peptide domain iscleaved and removed. The short cytoplasmic tail of 40 amino acids isconsistent with results demonstrating that soluble VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1released by partial trypsin digestion of 231 cells is similar in size tointact VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (not shown).

Sequence analysis of the one clone obtained by expression cloning thathad a different restriction enzyme profile predicted an open readingframe of 931 amino acids with about a 47% homology to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1(FIG. 4). This human cDNA has a 93% sequence homology with ratneuropilin-2 (NP-2) and is identical to the recently cloned human NP-2(Chen et al., Neuron, 19, 547-559 (1997)).

Expression of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 in Adult Cell Lines and Tissues

Reports of NP-1 gene expression have been limited so far to the nervoussystem of the developing embryo (Takagi et al., Dev. Biol. 122, 90-100(1987); Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol. 29, 1-17 (1995); Takagi et al.,Dev. Biol. 170, 207-222 (1995)). Cell surface VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1, however, isassociated with non-neuronal adult cell types such as EC and a varietyof tumor-derived cells (Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767(1996)). Northern blot analysis was carried out to determine whethercells that crossed-linked ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ also synthesized VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1mRNA. (FIG. 5). VEGF₁₆₅R/N-1 mRNA levels were highest in 231 and PC3cells. VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 mRNA was detected to a lesser degree in HUVEC,LNCaP, EP-mel and RU-mel cells. There was little if any expression inMDA-MB-453 and WK-mel cells. The VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 gene expression patternswere consistent with our previous results showing that HUVEC, 231, PC3,LNCaP, EP-mel and RU-mel cells bind ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ to cell surfaceVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 but that MDA-MB-453 and WK-mel cells do not (Soker et al.,J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)).

VEGF₁₆₅RN-1 gene expression was analyzed also by Northern blot in avariety of adult tissues in comparison to KDR gene expression (FIG. 6).VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 mRNA levels were relatively highly in adult heart andplacenta and relatively moderate in lung, liver, skeletal muscle, kidneyand pancreas. A relatively low level of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 mRNA was detectedin adult brain. Interestingly, previous analysis of NP-1 gene expressionin mouse and chicken brain suggested that this gene was expressedprimarily during embryonic development and was greatly diminished afterbirth (Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol. 29, 1-17 (1995); Takagi et al.,Dev. Biol. 170, 207-222 (1995)). The tissue distribution of KDR mRNA wassimilar to that of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 with the exception that it was notexpressed highly in the heart. These results indicate that VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1is expressed widely in adult non-neuronal tissue, including tissues inwhich anaiogenesis occurs such as heart and placenta.

Characterization of VEGF₁₆₅ Binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1

In order to characterize the binding properties of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1,porcine aortic endothelial (PAE) cells were transfected with the cDNA ofVEGF ₁₆₅R/NP-1 The PAE cells were chosen for these expression studiesbecause they express neither KDR, Flt-1 (Waltenberger et al., J. Biol.Chem. 269, 26988-26995 (1994)) nor VEGF₁₆₅R. Stable cell linessynthesizing VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (PAE/NP-1) were established and ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅binding experiments were carried out (FIG. 7). ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding toPAE/NP-1 cells increased in a dose-dependent manner and reachedsaturation at approximately 30 ng/ml demonstrating that VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 isa specific VEGF₁₆₅ receptor (FIG. 7A). Scatchard analysis of VEGF₁₆₅binding revealed a single class of VEGF₁₆₅ binding sites with a K_(d) ofapproximately 3.2×10⁻¹⁰M and approximately 3×10⁵ ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ bindingsites per cell (FIG. 7B). Similar K_(d) values were obtained for severalindependently-generated PAE/NP-1 clones, although the receptor numbervaried from clone to clone (not shown). The K_(d) of 3×10⁻¹⁰ M for thePAE/NP-1 cell lines is consistent with the 2-2.8×10⁻¹⁰ M K_(d) valuesobtained for VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 expressed naturally by HUVEC and 231 cells(Gitay-Goren et al., J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6093-6098 (1992); Soker et al.,J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). The binding of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ toPAE/NP-1 cells was enhanced by 1 μg/ml heparin (not shown), consistentwith previous studies showing that heparin enhances ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ bindingto VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 on HUVEC and 231 cells (Gitay-Goren et al., J. Biol.Chem. 267, 6093-6098 (1992); Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767(1996)).

Isoform-specific Binding of VEGF to Cells Expressing VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1

VEGF₁₆₅, but not VEGF₁₂₁, binds to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 on HUVEC and 231 cells(Gitay-Goren et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5519-5523 (1992); Soker et al.,J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). To ascertain whether cellstransfected with VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 had the same binding specificity.PAE/NP-1 cells were incubated with ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ or ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₂₁ followedby cross-linking (FIG. 8). ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ did not bind to parental PAEcells (FIG. 8, lane 3) but did bind to PAE/NP-1 cells via VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1(FIG. 8, lane 4). The radiolabeled complexes formed with VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1were similar in size to those formed in HUVEC (FIG. 8, lane 1) and PC3cells (FIG. 8, lane 2). On the other hand, ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₂₁, did not bind toeither parental PAE (FIG. 8, lane 7) or to PAE/NP-1 cells (FIG. 8, lane8). These results demonstrate that the VEGF isoform-specific bindingthat occurs with cells expressing endogenous VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 such asHUVEC, 231 and PC3 cells, can be replicated in cells transfected withVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA and support the finding that VEGF₁₆₅R and NP-1 areidentical.

Co-expression of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and KDR Modulates VEGF₁₆₅ Binding to KDR

To determine whether expression of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 had any effect onVEGF₁₆₅ interactions with KDR, PAE cells that were previouslytransfected with KDR cDNA to produce stable clones of PAE/KDR cells(Waltenberger et al., J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26988-26995 (1994)), weretransfected with VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA and stable clones expressing bothreceptors (PAE/KDR/NP-1) were obtained. These cells bound ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅to KDR (FIG. 8, lane 6, upper complex) and to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (FIG. 8,lane 6, lower complex) to yield a cross-linking profile similar to HUVEC(FIG. 8, lane 1). On the other hand, the PAE/KDR/NP-1 cells bound¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₂₁ to form a complex only with KDR (FIG. 8, lanes 9 and 10),consistent with the inability of VEGF₁₂₁ to bind VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1.

It appeared that in cells co-expressing KDR and VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (FIG. 8,lane 6), the degree of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅-KDR 240 kDa complex formation wasenhanced compared to the parental PAE/KDR cells (FIG. 8, lane 5). Theseresults were reproducible and the degree of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅-KDR 240 kDacomplex formation in different clones was correlated positively with thelevels of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 expressed (not shown). However, it could not beruled out definitively that these differential KDR binding results werepossibly due to clonal selection post-transfection. Therefore, parentalPAE/KDR cells were transfected with VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA and ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅was bound and cross-linked to the cells three days later in order toavoid any diversity of KDR expression among individual clones (FIG. 9).A labeled 240 kDa complex containing KDR was formed in parental PAE/KDRcells (FIG. 9, lane 1) and in PAE/KDR cells transfected with theexpression vector (FIG. 9, lane 2). However, when ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ wascross-linked to PAE/KDR cells transiently expressing VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1, amore intensely labeled 240 kDa complex, about 4 times greater, wasobserved (FIG. 9, lane 3), compared to parental PAE/KDR cells (FIG. 9,lane 1) and PAE/KDR cells transfected with expression vector (FIG. 9,lane 2). These results suggest that co-expression of KDR andVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 genes in the same cell enhances the ability of VEGF₁₆₅ tobind to KDR.

A GST-VEGF Exon 7+8 Fusion Protein Inhibits VEGF₁₆₅ Binding toVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and KDR

We have shown that ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binds to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 through its exon7-encoded domain (Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)).In addition, a GST fusion protein containing the peptide encoded by VEGFexon 7+8 (GST-Ex 7+8), inhibits completely the binding of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 associated with 231 cells and HUVEC (Soker et al., J.Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996); Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 272,31582-31588 (1997)). When, added to PAE/NP-1 cells, the fusion proteincompletely inhibited binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (FIG. 10, lane 2 comparedto lane 1). On the other hand, it did not inhibit ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ bindingat all to KDR (FIG. 10, lane 4 compared to lane 3). Thus, these resultsdemonstrate that GST-Ex 7+8 binds directly to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 but does notbind to KDR. The effects of GST-Ex 7+8 are different, however, in cellsco-expressing both VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and KDR (PAE/KDR/NP-1). Consistent withthe results in FIGS. 8 and 9, the degree of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding to KDRin PAE/KDR/NP-1 cells (FIG. 10, lane 5) was greater than to the parentalPAE/KDR cells (FIG. 10, lane 3). Interestingly, in PAE/KDR/NP-1 cells,GST-Ex 7+8 inhibited not only ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1completely as expected, but it also inhibited binding to KDRsubstantially which was unexpected (FIG. 10, lane 6 compared to lane 5).In the presence of GST-Ex 7+8, binding of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ to KDR in thesecells was reduced to the levels seen in parental PAE/KDR cells notexpressing VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (FIG. 10, lane 6 compared to lanes 3 and 4).Since the fusion protein does not bind directly to KDR, these resultssuggest that inhibiting the binding of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1directly, inhibits its binding to KDR indirectly. Taken together, theresults in FIGS. 8, 9 and 10 suggest that interactions of VEGF₁₆₅ withVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 enhance VEGF interactions with KDR.

Neuropilin-1 is an Isoform-specific VEGF₁₆₅ Receptor

Recently, we described a novel 130-135 kDa VEGF cell surface receptorthat binds VEGF₁₆₅ but not VEGF₁₂₁ and that we named, accordingly,VEGF₁₆₅R (Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). We havenow purified VEGF₁₆₅R, expression cloned its cDNA, and shown it to beidentical to human neuropilin-1 (NP-1) (He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90739-751 (1997)). The evidence that VEGF₁₆₅R is identical to NP-1 andthat NP-1 serves as a receptor for VEGF₁₆₅ is as follows: i)purification of VEGF₁₆₅R protein from human MDA-MB-231 (231) cells usingVEGF affinity, yielded a 130-140 kDa doublet upon SDS-PAGE and silverstain. N-terminal sequencing of both proteins yielded the sameN-terminal sequence of 18 amino acids that demonstrated a high degree ofhomology to mouse NP-1 (Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol. 29, 1-17 (1995));ii) After we purified VEGF₁₆₅R from human 231 cells, the cloning ofhuman NP-1 was reported (He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-751(1997)) and the N-terminal sequence of human VEGF₁₆₅R was found to beidentical to a sequence in the N-terminal region of human NP-1; iii)Expression cloning using a 231 cell cDNA library resulted in isolationof several cDNA clones and their sequences were identical to the humanNP-1 cDNA sequence (He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-751 (1997)).The combination of purification and expression cloning has the advantageover previous studies where only expression cloning was used (He andTessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-751 (1997); Kolodkin et al., Cell 90,753-762 (1997)), in allowing unambiguous identification of the NP-1protein N-terminus, iv) Northern blot analysis of NP-1 gene expressionwas consistent with previous ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ cross-linking experiments(Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). Cells that boundVEGF₁₆₅ to VEGF₁₆₅R synthesized relatively abundant NP-1 mRNA whilecells that showed very little if any VEGF₁₆₅ binding, did not synthesizemuch if any NP-1 mRNA; v) when NP-1 was expressed in PAE cells, thetransfected, but not the parental cells, were able to bind VEGF₁₆₅ butnot VEGF₁₂₁, consistent with the isoform specificity of bindingpreviously shown for HUVEC and 231 cells (Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem.271, 5761-5767 (1996)). Furthermore, the K_(d) of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ bindingof to PAE expressing NP-1 was about 3×10⁻¹⁰ M, consistent with previousK_(d) binding values of 2-2.8×10⁻¹⁰ M for 231 cells and HUVEC (Soker etal., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)); and vi) The binding ofVEGF₁₆₅ to cells expressing NP-1 post-transfection was more efficient inthe presence of heparin as was the binding of this ligand to HUVEC and231 cells (Gitay-Goren et al., J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6093-6098 (1992);Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). Taken together,these results show not only that VEGF₁₆₅R is identical to NP-1 but thatit is a functional receptor that binds VEGF₁₆₅ in an isoform-specificmanner. Accordingly, we have named this VEGF receptor VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1.

In addition to the expression cloning of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA, anotherhuman cDNA clone was isolated whose predicted amino acid sequence was47% homologous to that of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and over 90% homologous to ratneuropilin-2 (NP-2) which was recently cloned (Kolodkin et al., Cell 90,753-762 (1997)). NP-2 binds members of the collapsin/semaphorin familyselectively (Chen et al., Neuron 19, 547-559 (1997)).

The discovery that NP-1 serves as a receptor for VEGF₁₆₅ was a surprisesince NP-1 had previously been shown to be associated solely with thenervous system during embryonic development (Kawakami et al., J.Neurobiol. 29, 1-17 (1995); Takagi et al., Dev. Biol. 170, 207-222(1995)) and more recently as a receptor for members of thecollapsin/semaphorin family (He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90739-751(1997); Kolodkin et al., Cell 90, 753-762 (1997)). NP-1 is a 130-140 kDatransmembrane glycoprotein first identified in the developing Xenopusoptic system (Takagi et al., Dev. Biol. 122, 90-100 (1987); Takagi etal., Neuron 7, 295-307 (1991)). NP-1 expression in the nervous system ishighly regulated spatially and temporally during development and inparticular is associated with those developmental stages when axons areactively growing to form neuronal connections. (Fujisawa et al., Dev.Nezirosci. 17, 343-349 (1995); Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol 29, 1-17(1995); Takagi et al., Dev. Biol. 170, 207-222 (1995)). The NP-1 proteinis associated with neuronal axons but not the stomata (Kawakami et al.,J. Neurobiol 29, 1-17 (1995)). Functionally, neuropilin has been shownto promote neurite outgrowth of optic nerve fibers in vitro (Hirata etal., Neurosci. Res. 17, 159-169 (1993)) and to promote cell adhesiveness(Tagaki et al., Dev. Biol 170, 207-222 (1995)). Targeted disruption ofNP-1 results in severe abnormalities in the trajectory of efferentfibers of the peripheral nervous system (Kitsukawa et al., Neuron 19,995-1005 (1997)). Based on the these studies, it has been suggested thatNP-1 is a neuronal cell recognition molecule that plays a role in axongrowth and guidance (Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol. 29, 1-17 (1995); Heand Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-751 (1997); Kitsukawa et al., Neuron19, 995-1005 1997; Kolodkin et al., Cell 90, 753-762 (1997)).

Our results are the first to show that VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 is also expressedin adult tissues, in contrast to the earlier studies that have shownthat NP-1 expression in Xenopus, chicken and mouse is limited to thedevelopmental and early post-natal stages (Fujisawa et al., Dev.Neurosci. 17, 343-349 (1995); Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol. 29, 1-17(1995); Takagi et al., Dev. Biol. 170, 207-222 (1995)). For example, inmice, NP-1 is expressed in the developing nervous system starting in thedorsal root ganglia at day 9 and ceases at day 15 (Kawakami et al., J.Neurobiol. 29, 11-17 (1995). Our Northern blot analysis of human adulttissue demonstrates relatively high levels of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 mRNAtranscripts in heart, placenta, lung, liver, skeletal muscle, kidney andpancreas. Interestingly, there is very little relative expression inadult brain, consistent with the mouse nervous system expression studies(Kawakami et al., J. Neurobiol. 29, 1-17 (1995)). VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 is alsoexpressed in a number of cultured non-neuronal cell lines including ECand a variety of tumor-derived cells. A possible function ofVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 in these cells is to mediate angiogenesis as will bediscussed below.

In addition, NP-1 has been identified as a receptor for thecollapsin/semaphorin family by expression cloning of a cDNA libraryobtained from rat E14 spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) tissue(He and Tessier-Lavigne. Cell 90, 739-751 (1997); Kolodkin et al., Cell90, 753-762 (1997)). The collapsin/semaphorins (collapsin-D-1/SemaIII/Sem D) comprise a large family of transmembrane and secretedglycoproteins that function in repulsive growth cone and axon guidance(Kolodkin et al., Cell 75, 1389-1399 (1993)). The repulsive effect ofsema III for DRG cells was blocked by anti-NP-1 antibodies (He andTessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-751 (1997); Kolodkin et al., Cell 90,753-762 (1997)). The K_(d) of sema III binding to NP-1, 0.15-3.25×10⁻¹⁰M (He and Tessier-Lavigne, Cell 90, 739-751 (1997); Kolodkin et al.,Cell 90, 753-762 (1997)) is similar to that of VEGF₁₆₅ bindingVEGF₁₆₅/NP-1, which is about 3×10⁻¹⁰ M. These results indicate that twostructurally different ligands with markedly different biologicalactivities, VEGF-induced stimulation of EC migration and proliferationon one hand, and sema III-induced chemorepulsion of neuronal cells, onthe other hand, bind to the same receptor and with similar affinity. Aninteresting question is whether the two ligands bind to the same site onVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 or to different sites. VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 has five discretedomains in its ectodomain, and it has been suggested that this diversityof protein modules in NP-1 is consistent with the possibility ofmultiple binding ligands for NP-1 (Takagi et al., Neuron 7, 295-307(1991); Feiner et al., Neuron 19 539-545 (1997); He and Tessier-Lavigne,Cell 90 739-751 (1997). Preliminary analysis does not indicate any largedegree of sequence homology between sema III and VEGF exon 7 which isresponsible for VEGF binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (Soker et al., J. BiolChem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). However there may be some 3-dimensionalstructural similarities between the two ligands. Since both neurons andblood vessels display branching and directional migration, the questionalso arises as to whether VEGF₁₆₅ displays any neuronal guidanceactivity and whether sema III has any EC growth factor activity. Thesepossibilities have not been examined yet. However, it may be that VEGFrequires two receptors, KDR and NP-1 for optimal EC growth factoractivity (Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31582-31588 (1997)) and thatsema III requires NP-1 and an as yet undetermined high affinity receptorfor optimal chemorepulsive activity (Feiner et al., Neuron 19, 539-545(1997;) He and Tessier-Lavigne. Cell 90, 739-751 (1997): Kitsukawa etal., Neuron 19, 995-1005 (1997)), so that the presence of NP-1 alonemight not be sufficient for these ligands to display novel biologicalactivities. Future studies will determine whether there are anyconnections between the mechanisms that regulate neurogenesis andangiogenesis. VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 role in angiogenesis

VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 modulates the binding of VEGF₁₆₅ to KDR, a high affinityRTK that is an important regulator of angiogenesis as evidenced by KDRknock out experiments in mice (Shalaby et al., Nature 376, 62-66 (1995).The affinity of KDR for VEGF₁₆₅ is about 50 times greater than forVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 (Gitay-Goren et al., J. Biol. Chem. 287, 6003-6096 (1992);Waltenberger et al., J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26988-26995 (1994)). WhenVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and KDR are co-expressed, the binding of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ toKDR is enhanced by about 4-fold compared to cells expressing KDR alone.The enhanced binding can be demonstrated in stable clones co-expressingVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and KDR (PAE/KDR/NP-1 cells), and also in PAE/KDR cellstransfected transiently with VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 cDNA where clonal selectiondoes not take place. Conversely, when the binding of ¹²⁵I-VEGF₁₆₅ toVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 in PAE/KDR/NP-1 cells is inhibited completely by a GSTfusion protein containing VEGF exons 7+8 (GST-Ex 7+8), the binding toKDR is inhibited substantially, down to the levels observed in cellsexpressing KDR alone. The fusion protein binds to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 directlybut is incapable of binding to KDR directly (Soker et al., J. Biol.Chem. 272, 31582-31588 (1997)). Although, not wishing to be bound bytheory, we believe that VEGF₁₆₅ binds to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 via the exon7-encoded domain and facilitates VEGF₁₆₅ binding to KDR via the exon4-encoded domain (FIG. 11). VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1, with its relatively highreceptor/cell number, about 0.2-2×10⁵ (Gitay-Goren et al., J. Biol Chem.287, 6003-6096 (1992); Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767(1996)), appears to serve to concentrate VEGF₁₆₅ on the cell surface,thereby providing greater access of VEGF₁₆₅ to KDR. Alternatively,binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1, VEGF₁₆₅ undergoes a conformational change thatenhances its binding to KDR. The end result would be elevated KDRsignaling and increased VEGF activity. Although we can demonstrateenhanced binding to KDR to date we have not been able to demonstrateenhanced VEGF mitogenicity for PAE/KDR/NP-1 cells compared to PAE/KDRcells. One reason is that these cell lines do not proliferate readily inresponse to VEGF as do HUVEC (Waltenberger et al., J. Biol. Chem. 269,26988-26995 (1994). Nevertheless, we have shown that VEGF₁₆₅, whichbinds to both KDR and VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1, is a better mitogen for HUVEC thanis VEGF₁₂₁, which binds only to KDR (Keyt et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271,5638-5646 (1996b); Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31582-31588 (1997).Furthermore, inhibiting VEGF₁₆₅ binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 on HUVEC byGST-EX 7+8, inhibits binding to KDR and also inhibits VEGF₁₆₅-inducedHUVEC proliferation, down to the level induced by VEGF₁₂₁ (Soker et al.,J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31582-31588 (1997)). Taken together, these resultssuggest a role for VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 in mediating VEGF₁₆₅, but not VEGF₁₂₁mitogenic activity. The concept that dual receptors regulate growthfactor binding and activity has been previously demonstrated for TGF-β,bFGF and NGF (Lopez-Casillas et al., Cell 67, 785-795 (1991); Yayon etal., Cell 64, 841-848 (1991; Barbacid, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 148-155(1995)).

Another connection between VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 and angiogenesis comes fromstudies in which NP-1 was overexpressed ectopically in transgenic mice(Kitsuskawa et al., Develop. 121, 4309-4318 (1995)). NP-1 overexpressionresulted in embryonic lethality and the mice died in utero no later thanon embryonic day 15.5 and those that survived the best had lower levelsof NP-1 expression. Mice overexpressing NP-1 displayed morphologicabnormalities in a limited number of non-neural tissues such as bloodvessels, the heart and the limbs. NP-1 was expressed in both the EC andin the mesenchymal cells surrounding the EC. The embryos possessedexcess and abnormal capillaries and blood vessels compared to normalcounterparts and in some cases dilated blood vessels as well. Some ofthe chimeric mice showed hemorrhaging, mainly in the head and neck.These results are consistent with the possibility that ectopicoverexpression of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 results in inappropriate VEGF₁₆₅activity, thereby mediating enhanced and/or aberrant angiogenesis.Another piece of evidence for a link between NP-1 and angiogenesis comesfrom a recent report showing that in mice targeted for disruption of theNP-1 gene, the embryos have severe abnormalities in the peripheralnervous system but that their death in utero at days 10.5-12.5 is mostprobably due to anomalies in the cardiovascular system (Kitsukawa etal., Neuron 19. 995-1005 (1997)). VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 is associated withtumor-derived cells

The greatest degree of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 expression that we have detected sofar occurs in tumor-derived cells such as 231 breast carcinoma cells andPC3 prostate carcinoma cells, far more than occurs in HUVEC. The tumorcells express abundant levels of VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 mRNA and about 200,000VEGF₁₆₅ receptors/cell (Soker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767(1996)). On the other hand, these tumor cells do not express KDR orFlt-1 so that VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 is the only VEGF receptor associated withthese cells. The tumor cells are therefore useful for testing whetherVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 is a functional receptor for VEGF₁₆₅ in the absence of aKDR background. To date, we have not been able to show thatVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 mediates a VEGF₁₆₅ signal in tumor-derived cells asmeasured by receptor tyrosine phopshorylation. Nevertheless, VEGF₁₆₅might have an effect on tumor cells by inducing some, as yetundetermined activity such as enhanced survival, differentiation, ormotility. A recent report has demonstrated that glioma cells express a190 kDa protein that binds VEGF₁₆₅ but not VEGF₁₂₁, efficiently (Omuraet al., J. Biol Chem. 272, 23317-23322 (1997)). No stimulation oftyrosine phosphorylation could be demonstrated upon binding of VEGF₁₆₅to this receptor. Whether the 190 kDa isoform-specific receptor isrelated to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 is not known presently.

VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 may have a storage and sequestration function for VEGF₁₆₅.One might envision that VEGF₁₆₅ is produced by a tumor cell and binds toVEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 on that cell via the exon 7-encoded domain (Soker et al.,J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5761-5767 (1996)). The stored VEGF₁₆₅ could be thenreleased to stimulate tumor angiogenesis in a paracrine manner.Alternatively, VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 may mediate a juxtacrine effect in whichVEGF₁₆₅ is bound to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 on a tumor cell via the exon 7-encodeddomain and is also bound to KDR on a neighboring EC via the exon4-encoded domain (Keyt et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5638-5646 (1996b)).Such a mechanism could result in a more efficient way for tumor cells toattract EC, thereby enhancing tumor angiogenesis.

In summary, we have demonstrated by independent purification andexpression cloning methods that the VEGF isoform specific receptor,VEGF₁₆₅R, is identical to NP-1, a cell surface protein previouslyidentified as playing a role in embryonic development of the nervoussystem and as being a receptor for the collapsins/semaphorins.Furthermore, binding to VEGF₁₆₅R/NP-1 enhances the binding of VEGF₁₆₅ toKDR on EC and tumor cells.

Experimental Rationale

We have discovered that tumor cell neuropilin-1 mediates tumor cellmotility and thereby metastasis. In a Boyden chamber motility assay,VEGF₁₆₅ (50 ng/ml) stimulates 231 breast carcinoma cell motility in adose-response manner, with a maximal 2-fold stimulation (FIG. 15A). Onthe other hand, VEGF₁₂₁, has no effect on motility of these cells (FIG.15B). Since 231 cells do not express KDR or Flt-1, these results suggestthat tumor cells are directly responsive to VEGF₁₆₅ and that VEGF₁₆₅might signal tumor cells via neuropilin-1. Possible candidates formediating VEGF₁₆₅-induced motility of carcinoma cells are PI3-kinase(PI3-K) (Carpenter, et al. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8: 153-158.).Since 231 cells do not express KDR or Flt-1, these results suggest thattumor cells are directly responsive to VEGF₁₆₅ and that VEGF₁₆₅ mightsignal tumor cells via neuropilin-1.

The other type of evidence is that neuropilin-1 expression might beassociated with tumor cell motility. We have analyzed two variants ofDunning rat prostate carcinoma cells, AT2.1 cells, which are of lowmotility and low metastatic potential, and AT3.1 cells, which are highlymotile, and metastatic. Cross-linking and Northern blot analysis showthat AT3.1 cells express abundant neuropilin-1, capable of bindingVEGF₁₆₅, while AT2.1 cells don't express neuropilin-1 (FIG. 16).Immunostaining of tumor sections confirms the expression of neuropilin-1in AT3.1, but not AT2.1 tumors. Furthermore, the immunostaining showsthat in subcutaneous AT3.1 and PC3 tumors, the tumor cells expressingneuropilin-1 are found preferentially at the invading front of thetumor/dermis boundary. To determine more directly whether neuropilin-1expression is correlated with enhanced motility, neuropilin-1 wasoverexpressed in AT2.1 cells (FIG. 17). Three stable clones of AT2.1cells overexpressing neuropilin-1 had enhanced motility in the Boydenchamber assay. These results indicate that expression of neuropilin-1 inAT2.1 cells enhances their motility. Taken together, it appears thatneuropilin-1 expression on tumor cells is associated with the motile,metastatic phenotype.

EXAMPLE 2

Construction of sNP-1 and sNP-2

The cDNAs encoding the soluble forms of neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2were cloned from an oligo dT-primed cDNA library which was synthesizedfrom PC3 cell mRNA.

Soluble Neuropilin-1 (sNP-1) cDNA Cloning:

The sNP-1 cDNA deviates from the full length NP-1 cDNA between the b2and c domains after amino acid 641, at the position of an exon-exonboundary. The 3′ end of the sNP-1 clone possesses 28 bp of intronsequence, encoding three novel amino acids and a translation stop codon.

An oligonucleotide (GAAGTATACGGTTGCAAGATA SEQ ID NO: 16) designed fromwithin the b1 domain was used in 3′ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNAends) to clone the 3′ end of the sNP-1 cDNA. The full length sNP-1 cDNAwas subsequently cloned from the PC3 library by RT-PCR using primers atthe 5′ (GCGTTCCTCTCGGATCCAGGC SEQ ID NO:17) and 3′ (CAGGTATCAAATAAAATACSEQ ID NO:18) ends of the sNP-1 open reading frame (ORF). The sNP-1 cDNAwas tagged with His and c-myc domains (amino acids HHHHHHQQKLISQQNL SEQID NO:19) in the N-terminus of the a1 domain between amino acids 43 and44 of sNP-1. The complete tagged sNP-1 cDNA was subcloned into thepcDNA3.1 mammalian expression plasmid. The nucleotide and amino acidsequence of the sNP-1 are set forth in the sequence listing as SEQ IDNOS:5 and 6, respectively.

Soluble Neuropilin-2 (sNP-2) cDNA Cloning:

The sNP-2 cDNA deviates from the full length NP-2 cDNA within the b2domain after amino acid 547, at the position of an exon-exon boundary.The 3′ end of the sNP-2 clone possesses 146 bp of intron sequenceencoding 8 novel amino acids and a translation stop codon.

An oligonucleotide GGCTGCCGGGTAACAGATGC SEQ ID NO:20) designed fromwithin the b1 domain was used in 3′ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNAends) to clone the 3′ end of the sNP-2 cDNA. The full length sNP-2 cDNAwas subsequently cloned from the PC3 library by RT-PCR using primers atthe 5′ (ATGGATATGTTTCCTCTC SEQ ID NO:21) and 3′ (GTTCTTGGAGGCCTCTGTAASEQ ID NO:22) ends of the sNP-2 open reading frame (ORF). The sNP-2 cDNAwas tagged with His and c-myc domains (amino acids HHHHHHQQKLISQQNL SEQID NO:19) in the N-terminus of the a1 domain between amino acids 31 and32 of sNP-2. The complete tagged sNP-2 cDNA was subcloned into thepcDNA3.1 mammalian expression plasmid. The nucleotide and amino acidsequence of sNP-2 are set forth in the sequence listing as SEQ ID NOS:7and 8 respectively.

EXAMPLE 3

Preparation of Soluble NP-1 (Domains AB and C)

-   1. The Sequence of NP-1 between the BamHI site (base 100) and the    XbaI site (base 4687) was subcloned between the BamHI and XbaI site    in pBluscript II KS (+) (Stratagene, La Jola Calif.) to yield    pBS-NP1.-   2. PCR was performed on NP-1 sequence with the following primers:-   Primer 1 (Forward): NdeI site (bold and underlined) at NP-1    base 2200) GGAATTCCATATGGTTTTAACTGTGAA (SEQ ID NO:23)-   Primer 2 (Reverse): Outside the transmembrane membrane domain at    NP-1 base 2823 including 6 histidine (his-tag) and an XbaI site    (bold and underlined)    GCTCTAGATTAATGATGATGATGATGATGGGTCTTCAACACATTGCC (SEQ ID NO:24) The    PCR DNA product (approx. 600 bp) was digested with NdeI and XbaI and    purified from an agarose gel. The plasmid pBS-NP1 was digested with    NdeI and XbaI and the large fragment containing the extracellular    portion of NP-1 was purified from an agarose gel and was served as    the vector. Ligation of the above PCR product and the vector was    performed and the resulting plasmid was named pBS-sNPhis.-   3. The plasmid pBS-sNPhis was digested with BamHI and XbaI and the    fragment containing the extracellular part of NP-1 (including the    his-tag) was subcloned in the BamHI and XbaI sites of pCPhygro    (described in the above examples and in Soker et al., Cell    92:735 (1998) to yield pCPhyg-sNPhis.-   4. The plasmid pCPhyg-sNPhis was transfected to CHO cells and    hygromycin resistant clones were selected and tested for expression    of soluble NP-1, soluble NP-1 was purified from the medium by using    nickel Sepharose beads.-   5. Clones were tested for sNP-1 expression in the following manner.    Medium was conditioned for 24 hours and the conditioned medium was    incubated with the lectin ConA for 24 hours. ConA bound material was    analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using an antibody against    the A domain of neuropilin-1.

The references cited throughout the specification are incorporatedherein by reference.

The present invention has been described with reference to specificembodiments. However, this application is intended to cover thosechanges and substitutions which may be made by those skilled in the artwithout departing from the spirit and the scope of the appended claims.

1. A method of inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation, comprisingcontacting endothelial cells with a soluble neuropilin consisting of theamino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:6.
 2. A method for inhibitingangiogenesis of a solid tumor, comprising administering a solubleneuropilin consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6.